Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:22
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Increase in Ariane 6 launch cadence could take several years - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Here’s what Ozempic and Wegovy are really doing to your mouth - The Independent
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ozempic and Mounjaro Patients Report Potentially Fatal New Side Effect - bestlifeonline.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Can both male and female cows be milked? Can bulls also be milked?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Is there a band whose members have been present for every one of their concerts?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What Happens to Your Body When You Eat Watermelon Regularly - Verywell Health
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Chevy Teases a New Corvette 'X' to Debut Next Week - Road & Track